amateur flâneur

A place for casual observation and comment- Email amateurflaneur@gmail.com with your pieces

The Media’s Coverage of Tragedy- Adrian Choa

I just thought I’d write a quick one after reading through the media’s coverage of the Boston bombings. It seems to me that the level of detail that such publications as the BBC and particularly the Daily Mail go into is both unnecessary and potentially dangerous.

In terms of the former adjective, articles taken up by high resolution images of blood-soaked streets accompanied by quotes and statistics on how many limbs were blown off or amputated are sickening and perverse. This level of grotesque detail was prevalent in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook shooting also, where the Daily Mail published such things as a map detailing the exact route the shooter took through the school, identifying where each corpse lay and how many bullets each child took. The Denver cinema shooting coverage was the same.

As stated before, I think this detail is equally dangerous. With shootings, the culprits become celebrities, names and kill counts that everyone can remember. The next person who for whatever reasons decides to plan a massacre has an idol or inspiration; a statistic to beat. With the Boston bombings, the BBC today has been detailing the devices found at the site; showing the use of a “1.6 gallon pressure cooker” triggered by a battery-powered circuit board to be effective alongside shrapnel and nails (“one with shards of metal and ball bearings, the other with nails” to be precise). Of course, terrorist cells or individuals have thousands of digital sources of information on bomb-making, but to be informed on the mechanisms and movements behind an attack which had such devastating effects is surely useful. With the school shootings, each weapon used, what type of ammunition and how many clips carried were also academically documented.

Of course, the media is entitled to and must publish the truth of events free from censorship. I do believe however that there has to be a level of care and moderation which favours decency and safety above profit.

Image

An Oscar-Winning Performance in Hawaii- Adrian Choa

As I sit on the beach wearing my Hawaiian shirt, sipping a Hawaiian pineapple soda and taking a break from listening to the echo of the ukulele that drifts from a nearby hotel to ash my hula cigar, I gain a warm feeling of perceived authenticity.

But perceived is all it is.

I get the feeling that us tourists are actors. Actors in a film we have seen before and wish to reenact, with an on-set stills photographer ever ready to upload and share.

The workers of this tourism industry are extras. They don their tribal dress, slap their knees as they dig a simmering pig corpse from the dirt before returning home to Netflix. All workers in any shop, from the souvenir stand to KFC, have seemingly been ordered to greet with “aloha” and end with “mahalo” despite their otherwise total ignorance of the Polynesian language. Bus drivers wear plastic flower wreaths.

A vaguely sickening mutual exploitation.

But I guess this is a symbiosis we can all enjoy. Of course, in order to experience foreign cultures for a time-scale as fleeting as a week or two, activities will inevitably be shallow. This is a depth which of course varies from place to place. However, you may not have London Calling playing at London Heathrow as Hula music was playing at Honolulu Int., but the authenticity of experience remains as deep as the fish n’ chips bag you hold or the v on that union jack “punk” t -shirt you got for a steal at the Camden market. I guess it’s unavoidable. It may take years within a chosen community to wholly get at it its root (not weeks or months as condescending gap yearers may preach). By then the places you frequent, activities you undertake and people you spend time with will be markedly different from those the postcards portray.

Despite these misgivings I can truly say that I love Hawaii. Shopfront façades cannot touch the warmth of both the climate and the locals, the inviting energy of the Waikiki streets, or the teal of the ocean.

For now I must be content with the $15 dollar plume of vanilla smoke which rises into the humid air. Despite a widespread awareness of such touristic falsity, whether it is a beret, a sombrero or a pair of mickey mouse ears which sits on your head, it is the addictive escape; the sight of grass on the other side which keeps us jumping on those airplanes.

Image

Haircuts- Tom Stevenson

Up until this year, I used to get my haircut at a salon. One of those Tony and Guy, Headmasters chains where they cut the air around your head for forty five minutes and a plump woman named Cheryl tells you about her child’s appalling struggle with dyslexia. They then charge you £35 for making you look like a gay medieval prince.

The saving grace of these establishments is the head massage.

The skinny tattooed girl who can’t be trusted with cutting real hair yet firmly, but gently digs her fingers into your scalp, tickles that inexplicably erogenous zone on the back of your head, kneads the shampoo in concentric circles and you sit there wondering if you can keep it all in or if you’ll have to audibly and visibly express the intolerable pleasure you’re experiencing. You know it’s being done to induce pleasure, but you can’t let out a lustful moan. You have to pretend this is how you always apply shampoo at home and it’s just nice to pay someone else to do it for you.

And for those of us who have tried it at home, we all know it’s just not the same.

So bearing in mind the cost, the awkward encounters with the hairwash girl and Cheryl, I decided to just start going to the barbers. The barber alternative to the hair wash is the clean shave. It does not include the intense arousal of the scalpwank, but it does feel pretty good and it made me feel very manly, mainly due to the fact that a man who greeted me with ‘come to the butcher’ was holding a straight razor across my throat. He forcefully pushed and pulled my head from one side to the other, etching away at my facial hair like an archaeologist trying to unearth dinosaur bones. At the end he slapped on some aftershave that I can only assume was pure gasoline due to scent and really quite sharp pain. I just couldn’t yelp or wince. It was a test of my manhood. So I left thinking how in both scenarios, the hair wash and the clean shave, I had paid for a feeling (pleasure and pain respectively) that I was trying my hardest to resist expressing.

I’m sure it’s just a stiff upper life British thing. I reckon in continental Europe the salons sound like brothels and the barbers like torture chambers.

razor2

Catfish- Flora Lenon

So there is a new (ish) show on MTV that I am addicted to.It is called ‘Catfish’ and it follows the love stories of people who meet online but haven’t met in person… yet.

The crux of it the program is that the person featured nine out of ten times does not resemble the pictures they have put up on their profile; mostly it is not their actual name they have been using and very often they use the wrong age and or even gender. The disingenuous nature of online dating or, indeed, the internet, is laid bare.

However, It is more than a precautionary tale. It is more about the so-called ‘catfish’’s personal problems than the heartbreak of the victim; the poor soul who has contacted MTV in order to determine the veracity of their virtual significant other’s persona. The ‘catfish’   is usually incredibly insecure and there exists deep-seated reasons why they are lying about who they are online. This new phenomenon which has arisen in conjunction with social networking reveals something rather dark about the general population: so many of them do not like who they are.

Although the show is entertaining it is simultaneously quite sombre. A catfish is now defined as someone who pretends to be someone else online, but this originated from the idea that when live cod are shipped around the world catfish are put in the tank with them to keep them agile (and therefore delicious upon arrival at their destination). At first it seems that this metaphor is a positive one, envisaging people in society who are introduced to keep the rest of us on our toes. However, the program delves beneath this positive facade,  making us aware of the levels of naivety lonely people possess and even more aware of the freaks who have wifi access.

456x330

Beanies-Per-Head- James Harmer

Apologies if there are some insulting abstractions in here, I haven’t got time to do research where I would have liked to so there may well be – but I think there is some truth to it. Now I think that beanies can look pretty good. Or at least, the people in them can. But something about them has bugged me ever since I noticed some hipsters sweating them, mid summer, a few years back. Then, while recently watching a late night rerun of Rocky, his gym trainer’s pretty Winter/Spring 2013 Collection headwear reminded me that my first exposure to the beanie was actually about twenty years ago during my trips up north to see family.

The beanie was originally adopted by blue collar workers who needed to keep their hair out the way without the visual obstruction of a brim. In fact, in the past many US colleges have forced freshman to wear this mark of the lower class as a badge of humiliation. How things have changed. As far as I am aware, it was not until the grunge/skater crazes of the 90/00s that it started to become heavily adopted by popular culture. Short or shaven hair was popular by this point and I guess I can see how an association with working class lineage made sense to a culture which was decidedly moving away from the happygo- lucky era of the 90s. Trends like this go in circles and it is not surprising the the beanie has returned. It does appear odd though, that this fashion accessory of the 90s grunge movement has reemerged in association with the current surge of electronic music – and been paired with the 80s fashions which emerged with the last great era of electronic rhythms.

asaplook1_242819

If the classical Hollywood, wealthy family stories of Home Alone (or Richie Rich!) are the epitome of the kind of shit Kurt Cobain and co were rebelling against, it is problematic that the beanie has emerged as the finishing piece for today’s outfits – which are almost identical to the things which our Kevin and co look so adorable in. I would suggest this is largely because both have been lumped in the dubious “retro” category. Beanies and patterned shirts etc. were both present in the early 90s, so both are “retro.”

But they come from very different places. I do not think for one minute that Home Alone or Richie Rich etc. would get made now. There are many well documented reasons for why such wealthy W.A.S.P families are less present on our screens in today’s world. I think the beanie is a way of reflecting this – “sure my clothes look like I’m going for a 1984 picnic in the Hamptons but if that was true I’d have big hair – I am wearing a wooly hat.”

On lengthy reflection, I feel this is where the source of my irk lies. The place I’ve seen (by far) most beanies-per-head is Dalston, where residents increasingly seem to be highly privileged kids who are desperate to appear otherwise – renting a warehouse they barely use at the same annual rate you could buy a house - paid for by their parents as they pursue their artistic inclinations. The problem is that by forcing prices up they and their beanies are forcing others out of their homes – many of whom are the modern-day equivalent of blue collar workers, the lineage of which is being replicated by said beanie. With people wearing them in situations and places which completely defy their purpose, the beanie is a particularly clear symbol for how people pursuing trends can damage the groups they inaccurately assimilate and commodify. There is a dramatic irony invoked by the beanie, which I fear will become increasingly tragic.

They do look alright though.

PS I’m sorry Home Alone, you know I still love you.

tumblr_lwgra2LPCA1qbok2po1_500

Going Underground- Anonymous Flâneur

135186_528239233881890_1537547986_o

Have you ever walked over a manhole cover or past a decaying door in a busy street and stopped to wonder what might be on the other side? For anyone with a sense of adventure a whole world of opportunity could lie in store.

I caught the bug on my year abroad in Paris.  Beneath the city streets lie nearly 300km of secret tunnel network that runs underneath every single arrondissement of the city. Although unauthorised access is illegal and most of the entrances are sealed, for those in the know there are portals dotted around the city that give unreserved access to every corner of the catacombs, whether through a certain manhole or an entrance in the wall of a train tunnel.

Far beneath the picture postcard boulevards and away from the tourist lens there exists a clandestine community who devote a huge amount of time to maintaining and even rebuilding the catacombs, carving out niches for themselves with highly sculpted furniture and rock features such as gargoyles. During our time in Paris we found breath-taking examples of the magnitude of this cultural heritage, such as an underground art gallery – only accessible after crawling down a chute through a tiny hole in the side of a tunnel wall – which boasted immense and intricate murals on the rock face itself. The real beauty in this art was that the creators knew they would only be sharing their work with those who really made the effort to find it.

After months of exploring the catacombs and having successfully thrown a theatrical dinner party on the platform of an abandoned underground railway station in southern Paris, we started looking for similar locations back at home and realised that if you take the time to look then the opportunity for adventure is endless.

http://vimeo.com/43669004

The foundations of Bristol may not be as extensive as Paris, but can be easily accessible, whether exploring the forgotten Clifton Rocks Railway, dug into the Avon Gorge underneath the suspension bridge and disused since its last mission as a WWII BBC secret transmission base, or the old freestone mines that provided much of the stone for the buildings that give Bristol and Bath their unique façade, complete with intact 19th Century cranes, stone trucks and most impressively, an underground chamber the size of a cathedral hall (no exaggeration).

We recently raised our game with an underground party in the disused Avon Gorge railway: accessed through a tiny derelict doorway in the rock face and buried deep inside the cliff we were hidden from prying eyes and made a historic part of the city our own for a night.

Abandoned buildings, underground tunnels and forgotten places exist everywhere: they are open to anyone with an aversion to the often mundane and recurring nature of any university social sphere and with an appreciation for discovering their city’s real hidden gems.

Channing Tatum- Lev Harris

Image

I know what you’re thinking.

What. A. Babe.

Rewind back to his first movie appearance in Coach Carter. Those sweaty biceps. That gormless face. Dreamboat.

So now that I have your attention,  I wish to address the big fat fake tanned elephant in the room. Something that all straight guys feel the need to keep hidden; their man crush.

Everyone has (at least) one.

Back to the T-man to illustrate my own point. Forget for a minute that he looks like your quintessential Keez Movies porn star. Maybe my admiration stems from the fact that he’s something of an anomaly in Hollywood; the buffed up action man who can actually act. You look at your Chris Hemsworths and your Sam Worthingtons. What do you think? Yeah you have fucking huge abs but you can’t act for shit mate.

Tatum has proven, albeit in some questionable films, that he does possess real acting chops. Possibly his best performance comes in the little-known indie flick A Guide To Recognising Your Saints, where he absolutely steals the show, and the film feels far less powerful and engrossing whenever he steps out of frame (as sure a sign as any).

I’m not going to start saying that Tatum’s filmography is spotless. He has been in films that I don’t even need to have seen to know that they are terrible. Try The Vow, Step Up and its indomitable sequel Step Up: The Streets (he must’ve got rid of his agent before Step Up 3D came about). But aside from maybe Brad Pitt and Daniel Day Lewis, whose filmographies can you look at and not say are wholly absent of clangers?

So yeah, Tates has also strutted his stuff in a couple of recent Sodebergh flicks Haywire and Side Effects. And, hey, if its good enough for Stevie, it’s good enough for me. And just to show his versatility, he can do comedy too, with roles in 21 Jump Street and Magic Mike. It’s easy to hate someone like Tatie boy, after all he is such a greased up easy target, but I’m not here just to provide a defence for my misplaced love for the guy.

Fundamentally, I’m here to tell all you lads out there that it’s okay to have a male crush. The secret is to be open about it. I know its hard, I know its painful, but it’s okay. Trust me. We’re here for each other. You won’t be laughed at, or shunned, and believe me, getting it out in the open will take the weight of the world off your shoulders. Come on boys, let’s bring it in.

And don’t even get me started on Ben Whishaw.

The Last Straw- Grace Hamer

Whilst watching ‘Give It Up for Comic Relief’, a special in aid of addicts, I began pondering some slightly more far-fetched addictions.

The programme was composed of music and comedy acts, interspersed with celebrity interviews in which they revealed their “addictions”. Many of the responses were sadly predictable (Jo Wiley: shopping (yawn), Robbie Williams: reality TV (hardly one of his most exciting!), Jarvis Cocker: Brick Breaker (gaming = lame), whilst Rob Brydon’s response of “milk and cookies” was a real gem: his earnestness really made the spectator believe that, although perhaps not a serious addiction, he’d certainly sacrifice a few flimsy friendships over forever being denied his hallowed milk and cookies. I don’t intend to trivialise addiction here, just merely peruse a few of the more bizarre and self-evidently less harmless ones.

After a quick cyber gander, the world wide web produced an array of predictable offerings: the internet (modest), tanning, exercise, tattoos, plastic surgery and cleaning (channelling the Andre Agassi circa ‘97 crystal meth vibe) – as well as some slightly more unusual ones: ice chewing (pagophagia), eating dirt (geophagy) and hair pulling (trichotillomania). Having suffered from the latter, I wondered whether I had any further strange addictions to bring to the table. I discounted ‘90s school crazes of Pokémon, yoyos, those gross squidgy alien things (how on earth those caught on is anyone’s guess) and so on and so forth, as well as my daily egg fried rice habit of second year… but one habit I can’t kick is something so seemingly superfluous and yet which brings me an unprecedented amount of joy: THE STRAW.

I brought a supply to a festival upon the recommendation of a dentist. And we have been inseparable ever since. We have survived the credit crunch, a papal resignation and several major natural disasters. It was the first word I learnt on my year abroad in Bordeaux: une paille – which subsequently became my most invaluable French noun. Straws went everywhere with me even drinking wine without one was a serious challenge.

So imagine my shock when a barmaid in Exeter at the weekend informed me that they had run out of straws, with nothing by way of explanation or apology. My reaction provoked a judgmentally furrowed brow and a most unladylike grunt in my general direction. I should, really, have informed her then and there that me being told there were no straws was something akin to telling Tinky Winky that the tubby toaster has gone kaputt and all the rabbits have got myxomatosis. When she thrust me the change, I duly noted the trampy orange tan stains between her spindly fingers. And I subsequently reflected, in impatiently rustling around my cavernous bag to retrieve an emergency straw (purposefully placed there for such emergencies), that I was hardly one to judge. For an addiction, when so trivial as tanning or straws, hurts no one but its owner. Besides, if we’re being serious about it, the rabbits have always seemed a little incongruous and Tinky Winky could do with losing a few pounds.

Image

Strawly Not

Edgy Girl guide: How to fit in at (insert generic house music night)

Edgy Girl guide: How to fit in at (insert generic house music night).

My Conflicting Emotions Concerning The Only Way is Essex- Adrian Choa

TOWIE (I deeply resent using this abbreviation) is a hugely odious show. The mere opening notes of the theme tune is enough to make me feel physically sick as an involuntary, visual shit-storm of terrifying memories suffocate me.

Haggard, orange women, small dogs and greased biceps repeatedly punch me in the face as I try desperately to change the channel.

Yet for some reason I do not.

I cannot.

There is something in this 40 minutes of misery which keeps me coming back.

I believe this to be a sort of morbid curiosity/perversion. An enthralling hatred that causes viewers to continually shout at the screen, letting loose a series of obscenities directed at characters and plot-lines alike.

This latter target brings about the second instance of conflicting emotions I experience whilst watching the show.

We are all fully aware that the entire thing is staged right? Yet, I still find myself saying “why would she do that?” or “wow, he’s such a dickhead”: sentences which are inevitably followed with “well it’s all fake anyway…” just to reassure myself that I haven’t been drawn in. Efforts aren’t even made to suspend our disbelief, with nightclub scenes being personified by full studio lighting and the bizarre, sparse positioning of three of four punters about the large interior. This is a far cry from the immersive night vision and subtitles of such classics as The Hills (Adam DiVello, 2006) or The City (Adam DiVello, 2008).  

I have concluded that the instinct which leads me to watch TOWIE is the very same instinct which leads millions of people to watch a man pummel a woman’s face on the tube after racial incitement. Or watch two women play with and then consume excrement. Or watch one part of N Dubz as the subject of a point of view shot.

This seems to be a shameful curiosity that has come to define the YouTube generation. I feel that this is perhaps a timeless human facet however, from the Gladiatorial Arena to Made in Chelsea. Perhaps it is a form of catharsis. A satisfying expulsion of frustration from afar.

Whatever it is, it fulfils my desire for an activity for those times when I wish to guarantee that 98% of my brain cells are not in use.

The Only Way Is Essex-1737869

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.